Research Question Identifiability and Design Feasibility Review
Test whether a research question can be answered with the proposed design, population, variables, data and estimand, separating repairable gaps from fatal limitations.
Amo.ng topic hub
Academic Research
Plan, evaluate and communicate academic research using traceable evidence, defensible methods, reproducible practices and accountable scholarly judgment.
24 Prompts
1 Workflow
6 Skills
Reliable academic research depends on answerable questions, appropriate methods, transparent evidence and conclusions that remain within what the sources and data support. This hub brings together Amo.ng resources for research design, preregistration, qualitative analysis, computational reproducibility, literature synthesis, citation integrity and oral defence.
Use the collection to refine research questions, test methodological coherence, organise evidence, document assumptions, reproduce computational work and prepare findings that supervisors, collaborators and reviewers can examine.
Featured Prompts
Browse all PromptsPreregistration and Statistical Analysis Plan Coherence Audit
Cross-check hypotheses, outcomes, exclusions, power assumptions, models, multiplicity controls and decision rules before data inspection, with deviations made explicit.
Qualitative Codebook Reliability and Reflexivity Protocol
Build and stress-test a qualitative codebook using traceable excerpts, rival interpretations, coder disagreement, positionality and documented adjudication.
Replication Package Computational Reproducibility Gate
Inspect a research package for data provenance, licensing, environment, code, seeds, dependencies and expected outputs, separating reproduced evidence from inaccessible work.
Reading-to-Argument Evidence Ledger
Convert assigned sources into a claim-to-evidence ledger that separates source findings, student interpretation, counterevidence and unresolved uncertainty before drafting.
Viva and Oral Defence Evidence Probe Builder
Create adaptive oral questions tied to a submitted artefact, with follow-ups that test reasoning, sources, decisions and limitations without treating fluency as proof of authorship.
Related Workflows
Browse all WorkflowsBuild and Defend an Evidence-Grounded Academic Argument
Move from a bounded academic question through source triage, a pre-draft evidence ledger, learner-owned argument development, claim verification, and an assessor-owned oral defence.
Related Skills
Browse all SkillsTrace Consequential Claims to Original Evidence
Apply a repeatable claim-provenance method that traces consequential wording through citations and intermediaries to original evidence, exposing mutation, laundering, and authority gaps.
Maintain Citation Currency and Supersession Decisions
Apply a recurring method to detect corrected, retracted, obsolete, or superseded citations and govern claim updates without confusing age with invalidity.
Prepare and Audit a Reproducible Research Package
Apply a repeatable evidence gate to a research handoff covering provenance, permissions, code, environment, dependencies, seeds, run instructions, expected outputs and reproduction gaps.
Design Reproducible Systematic Review Screening and Extraction Protocols
Create a defensible evidence-screening and extraction protocol for systematic, scoping, or living reviews, including eligibility rules, deduplication, reviewer decisions, appraisal, and flow reporting.
Synthesize a Research Corpus into a Traceable Literature Review
Turn a supplied source corpus into a literature synthesis that preserves study-level evidence, quality concerns, agreements, contradictions, uncertainty, and open research questions.
Build Reliable Qualitative Codebooks from Traceable Excerpts
Develop method-compatible qualitative coding records from traceable excerpts, preserving rival interpretations, reflexivity, privacy and the appropriate human calibration or analytic-dialogue process.
Explore more