Reusable AI capability
Prepare and Audit a Reproducible Research Package
Apply a repeatable evidence gate to a research handoff covering provenance, permissions, code, environment, dependencies, seeds, run instructions, expected outputs and reproduction gaps.
This Skill packages a reusable way to use the linked Prompt or Workflow; Amo.ng does not run it for you.
# Prepare and Audit a Reproducible Research Package Skill ID: AMO-S-000033 Skill URL: https://amo.ng/skills/prepare-audit-reproducible-research-package Purpose: Prepare and audit a self-contained computational research package so an authorized reviewer can distinguish reproduced results, divergences, inaccessible dependencies and unresolved evidence without inferring success from an incomplete run. Required inputs: - Research-package manifest and expected output references. - Data provenance, licences, permissions and access instructions. - Code, environment specification, dependencies, seeds and run instructions. - Actual execution logs, output checksums or reviewer observations when a run occurred. - Known deviations, inaccessible components and decision context. How to use: When to use: - Before handing a computational study to a collaborator, reviewer, repository or archive. - When testing whether a replication package contains enough evidence for an independent authorized run. - When documenting divergence between expected and observed outputs. When not to use: - To claim successful reproduction without supplied execution records. - To bypass data licences, participant restrictions, ethics conditions or secure-compute requirements. - As a substitute for disciplinary methods review, repository acceptance or research-integrity investigation. Instructions: Use the source Prompt as the operating audit, not as evidence that execution occurred. 1. Inventory every required package component and bind it to provenance, permission, version and owner evidence. 2. Separate static inspectability from executed reproduction. Record the environment, command, seed, input fingerprint, exit state and output comparison only when corresponding evidence exists. 3. Classify each expected result as reproduced within tolerance, diverged, not tested, inaccessible or not applicable. 4. Trace divergences to the smallest supported hypothesis; preserve alternative explanations and evidence requests. 5. Produce a handoff manifest, reproducibility matrix, deviation register and smallest next action. 6. Assign data-access, licensing, infrastructure, methods and release decisions to their accountable owners. Never insert credentials or protected data into the Skill input. A package that cannot lawfully be accessed is incomplete, not failed. Expected output: A versioned research-package manifest, execution evidence ledger, expected-versus-observed output matrix, divergence register, access/licensing gap list and bounded reproducibility disposition. Constraints and boundaries: - Do not claim an execution, checksum match or reproduced result without a supplied record. - Do not redistribute licensed, confidential or participant data. - Do not conceal environment drift or modify the reference package during an audit without a recorded change. - Repository deposit, ethics, data access and release remain with the responsible owners. Powered by Prompt: Replication Package Computational Reproducibility Gate Source ID: AMO-P-000325 https://amo.ng/prompts/replication-package-computational-reproducibility-gate Completion criteria: Complete when the package boundary and versions are fixed; every required artefact has provenance, permission and availability status; every reported run has reproducible evidence; expected outputs have an explicit disposition; divergences and inaccessible elements remain visible; and next actions have accountable owners. Otherwise return an incomplete-package record. Use this Amo.ng Skill with your preferred AI tool. Supply the required inputs and follow the usage instructions. # Prepare and Audit a Reproducible Research Package Skill ID: AMO-S-000033 Skill URL: https://amo.ng/skills/prepare-audit-reproducible-research-package Purpose: Prepare and audit a self-contained computational research package so an authorized reviewer can distinguish reproduced results, divergences, inaccessible dependencies and unresolved evidence without inferring success from an incomplete run. Required inputs: - Research-package manifest and expected output references. - Data provenance, licences, permissions and access instructions. - Code, environment specification, dependencies, seeds and run instructions. - Actual execution logs, output checksums or reviewer observations when a run occurred. - Known deviations, inaccessible components and decision context. How to use: When to use: - Before handing a computational study to a collaborator, reviewer, repository or archive. - When testing whether a replication package contains enough evidence for an independent authorized run. - When documenting divergence between expected and observed outputs. When not to use: - To claim successful reproduction without supplied execution records. - To bypass data licences, participant restrictions, ethics conditions or secure-compute requirements. - As a substitute for disciplinary methods review, repository acceptance or research-integrity investigation. Instructions: Use the source Prompt as the operating audit, not as evidence that execution occurred. 1. Inventory every required package component and bind it to provenance, permission, version and owner evidence. 2. Separate static inspectability from executed reproduction. Record the environment, command, seed, input fingerprint, exit state and output comparison only when corresponding evidence exists. 3. Classify each expected result as reproduced within tolerance, diverged, not tested, inaccessible or not applicable. 4. Trace divergences to the smallest supported hypothesis; preserve alternative explanations and evidence requests. 5. Produce a handoff manifest, reproducibility matrix, deviation register and smallest next action. 6. Assign data-access, licensing, infrastructure, methods and release decisions to their accountable owners. Never insert credentials or protected data into the Skill input. A package that cannot lawfully be accessed is incomplete, not failed. Expected output: A versioned research-package manifest, execution evidence ledger, expected-versus-observed output matrix, divergence register, access/licensing gap list and bounded reproducibility disposition. Constraints and boundaries: - Do not claim an execution, checksum match or reproduced result without a supplied record. - Do not redistribute licensed, confidential or participant data. - Do not conceal environment drift or modify the reference package during an audit without a recorded change. - Repository deposit, ethics, data access and release remain with the responsible owners. Powered by Prompt: Replication Package Computational Reproducibility Gate Source ID: AMO-P-000325 https://amo.ng/prompts/replication-package-computational-reproducibility-gate Completion criteria: Complete when the package boundary and versions are fixed; every required artefact has provenance, permission and availability status; every reported run has reproducible evidence; expected outputs have an explicit disposition; divergences and inaccessible elements remain visible; and next actions have accountable owners. Otherwise return an incomplete-package record.Copy skill copies the Skill details. Use with AI adds a short instruction for your preferred AI tool; neither action runs the Skill.
Purpose
Prepare and audit a self-contained computational research package so an authorized reviewer can distinguish reproduced results, divergences, inaccessible dependencies and unresolved evidence without inferring success from an incomplete run.
Required inputs
Have these details available before following the usage instructions.
- Research-package manifest and expected output references.
- Data provenance, licences, permissions and access instructions.
- Code, environment specification, dependencies, seeds and run instructions.
- Actual execution logs, output checksums or reviewer observations when a run occurred.
- Known deviations, inaccessible components and decision context.
How to use this Skill
When to use:
- Before handing a computational study to a collaborator, reviewer, repository or archive.
- When testing whether a replication package contains enough evidence for an independent authorized run.
- When documenting divergence between expected and observed outputs.
When not to use:
- To claim successful reproduction without supplied execution records.
- To bypass data licences, participant restrictions, ethics conditions or secure-compute requirements.
- As a substitute for disciplinary methods review, repository acceptance or research-integrity investigation.
Instructions:
Use the source Prompt as the operating audit, not as evidence that execution occurred.
1. Inventory every required package component and bind it to provenance, permission, version and owner evidence.
2. Separate static inspectability from executed reproduction. Record the environment, command, seed, input fingerprint, exit state and output comparison only when corresponding evidence exists.
3. Classify each expected result as reproduced within tolerance, diverged, not tested, inaccessible or not applicable.
4. Trace divergences to the smallest supported hypothesis; preserve alternative explanations and evidence requests.
5. Produce a handoff manifest, reproducibility matrix, deviation register and smallest next action.
6. Assign data-access, licensing, infrastructure, methods and release decisions to their accountable owners.
Never insert credentials or protected data into the Skill input. A package that cannot lawfully be accessed is incomplete, not failed.
Expected output:
A versioned research-package manifest, execution evidence ledger, expected-versus-observed output matrix, divergence register, access/licensing gap list and bounded reproducibility disposition.
Constraints and boundaries:
- Do not claim an execution, checksum match or reproduced result without a supplied record.
- Do not redistribute licensed, confidential or participant data.
- Do not conceal environment drift or modify the reference package during an audit without a recorded change.
- Repository deposit, ethics, data access and release remain with the responsible owners.
Powered by an Amo.ng Prompt
Replication Package Computational Reproducibility Gate
Open the linked prompt to use the instructions that power this Skill.
Completion criteria
Complete when the package boundary and versions are fixed; every required artefact has provenance, permission and availability status; every reported run has reproducible evidence; expected outputs have an explicit disposition; divergences and inaccessible elements remain visible; and next actions have accountable owners. Otherwise return an incomplete-package record.
Was this useful?
Related Prompts
Browse PromptsQualitative Codebook Reliability and Reflexivity Protocol
Build and stress-test a qualitative codebook using traceable excerpts, rival interpretations, coder disagreement, positionality and documented adjudication.
Preregistration and Statistical Analysis Plan Coherence Audit
Cross-check hypotheses, outcomes, exclusions, power assumptions, models, multiplicity controls and decision rules before data inspection, with deviations made explicit.
Research Question Identifiability and Design Feasibility Review
Test whether a research question can be answered with the proposed design, population, variables, data and estimand, separating repairable gaps from fatal limitations.
Preprint-to-Policy Use Risk Review
Decide whether preliminary research is mature enough to inform a policy or operating decision, with bounded claims, reversible use, and monitoring conditions.
Citation Obsolescence and Supersession Audit
Determine whether cited evidence remains current and authoritative after corrections, retractions, updates, superseding guidance, or changed decision conditions.
Systematic Review Update Decision Brief
Decide whether an existing systematic review needs an update and define the safest bounded scope before committing review resources.