Maintain a repeatable vendor-renewal governance record covering the renewal clock, verified value and utilization, normalized commercial options, negotiation gates, transition readiness, and the final renew, resize, renegotiate, replace, or exit decision.
This Skill packages a reusable way to use the linked Prompt or Workflow; Amo.ng does not run it for you.
Skill ID
AMO-S-000002
Powered by
Prompt
Published
# Build an Evidence-Based Vendor Renewal Decision
Skill ID: AMO-S-000002
Skill URL: https://amo.ng/skills/build-an-evidence-based-vendor-renewal-decision
Purpose:
Help the commercial owner govern recurring vendor renewal decisions with traceable evidence, comparable scenarios, accountable review, and transition safeguards. This capability covers renewal, renegotiation, resizing, consolidation, replacement, and exit—not initial vendor procurement.
Required inputs:
- Current contract, amendments, renewal and notice dates, pricing, terms, and approval thresholds
- License, usage, adoption, service-performance, incident, support, and business-outcome evidence
- Direct, internal, dependency, transition, and risk-related cost evidence
- Security, privacy, compliance, resilience, financial, and operational findings
- Integration, data, identity, workflow, switching, export, deletion, coexistence, and rollback dependencies
- Credible renewal, resize, renegotiation, consolidation, replacement, extension, and exit options
- Commercial owner, finance reviewer, legal reviewer, security reviewer, operational owner, signature authority, and decision deadline
How to use:
When to use:
- Preparing for a vendor renewal, price or scope renegotiation, license resize, consolidation, replacement, temporary extension, or exit.
- Maintaining a recurring renewal record before contractual notice and approval deadlines.
- Reassessing value, utilization, service, risk, dependency, and transition evidence after material change.
When not to use:
- Initial vendor sourcing or pre-purchase procurement readiness.
- Treating an imminent auto-renewal deadline as permission to skip contractual, financial, legal, security, or operational review.
- Making an emergency service-continuity decision that belongs in incident or continuity procedures.
- Contacting the vendor, accepting terms, issuing notice, or committing funds without the applicable authority.
Reusable renewal-governance method:
1. Maintain the renewal clock: authoritative contract, covered scope, end date, notice method and deadline, approval lead time, negotiation window, transition lead time, and accountable roles.
2. Maintain an evidence register for contracts, invoices, utilization, outcomes, service records, incidents, risks, dependencies, alternatives, export tests, and transition estimates. Mark conflicts and evidence limitations.
3. Assess business outcomes and meaningful utilization separately; do not treat assigned seats, activity, sentiment, or sunk cost as proof of value.
4. Normalize total cost and assumptions across renewal, resize, renegotiation, consolidation, replacement, extension, and exit scenarios.
5. Review service performance, supplier risk, concentration, security, privacy, compliance, resilience, and operational dependencies with the relevant reviewers.
6. Test credible alternatives and transition readiness, including data portability, coexistence, integration changes, user migration, service continuity, rollback, retention, and deletion evidence.
7. Define negotiation objectives, required terms, tradeable terms, approval limits, fallback options, and a no-agreement plan without exposing restricted negotiation positions.
8. Issue a recommendation with conditions, unresolved evidence, dissent, decision rights, next actions, deadlines, and a reusable decision record for the next lifecycle review.
Expected output:
A living renewal record containing the renewal clock, evidence register, outcome and utilization review, normalized cost and scenario comparison, service and risk findings, dependency and transition map, negotiation gates, recommendation, accountable roles, approval questions, and implementation or exit actions.
Constraints and accountability:
- Do not treat vendor claims, demonstrations, roadmap statements, contract summaries, or internal estimates as verified evidence.
- Do not disclose confidential pricing, negotiation limits, security findings, personal data, or legal advice outside the authorized review group.
- Keep commercial approval with the commercial owner, financial validation with the finance reviewer, contractual interpretation with the legal reviewer, security conclusions with the security reviewer, operational feasibility with the operational owner, and signature with the authorized signatory.
- Use AMO-P-000259 as source grounding and for deeper analysis; maintain this Skill as the recurring governance method.
Powered by Prompt:
Vendor Renewal Decision Pack
Source ID: AMO-P-000259
https://amo.ng/prompts/vendor-renewal-decision-pack
Completion criteria:
Complete when:
- The contractual notice deadline, decision timetable, covered products and entities, and approval roles are confirmed or visibly unresolved.
- Value, meaningful utilization, service performance, cost, risk, dependencies, alternatives, and transition readiness are supported by dated evidence or labelled limitations.
- Relevant scenarios use comparable scope, time horizon, currency, cost categories, and assumptions.
- The recommendation states renew, renew with conditions, resize, renegotiate, consolidate, replace, extend, or exit, with rationale and conditions.
- Negotiation and transition actions have owners, deadlines, evidence needs, decision gates, acceptance conditions, and fallback or rollback provisions.
- The final decision record distinguishes recommendations from approvals and can be reused at the next renewal review.
Use this Amo.ng Skill with your preferred AI tool. Supply the required inputs and follow the usage instructions.
# Build an Evidence-Based Vendor Renewal Decision
Skill ID: AMO-S-000002
Skill URL: https://amo.ng/skills/build-an-evidence-based-vendor-renewal-decision
Purpose:
Help the commercial owner govern recurring vendor renewal decisions with traceable evidence, comparable scenarios, accountable review, and transition safeguards. This capability covers renewal, renegotiation, resizing, consolidation, replacement, and exit—not initial vendor procurement.
Required inputs:
- Current contract, amendments, renewal and notice dates, pricing, terms, and approval thresholds
- License, usage, adoption, service-performance, incident, support, and business-outcome evidence
- Direct, internal, dependency, transition, and risk-related cost evidence
- Security, privacy, compliance, resilience, financial, and operational findings
- Integration, data, identity, workflow, switching, export, deletion, coexistence, and rollback dependencies
- Credible renewal, resize, renegotiation, consolidation, replacement, extension, and exit options
- Commercial owner, finance reviewer, legal reviewer, security reviewer, operational owner, signature authority, and decision deadline
How to use:
When to use:
- Preparing for a vendor renewal, price or scope renegotiation, license resize, consolidation, replacement, temporary extension, or exit.
- Maintaining a recurring renewal record before contractual notice and approval deadlines.
- Reassessing value, utilization, service, risk, dependency, and transition evidence after material change.
When not to use:
- Initial vendor sourcing or pre-purchase procurement readiness.
- Treating an imminent auto-renewal deadline as permission to skip contractual, financial, legal, security, or operational review.
- Making an emergency service-continuity decision that belongs in incident or continuity procedures.
- Contacting the vendor, accepting terms, issuing notice, or committing funds without the applicable authority.
Reusable renewal-governance method:
1. Maintain the renewal clock: authoritative contract, covered scope, end date, notice method and deadline, approval lead time, negotiation window, transition lead time, and accountable roles.
2. Maintain an evidence register for contracts, invoices, utilization, outcomes, service records, incidents, risks, dependencies, alternatives, export tests, and transition estimates. Mark conflicts and evidence limitations.
3. Assess business outcomes and meaningful utilization separately; do not treat assigned seats, activity, sentiment, or sunk cost as proof of value.
4. Normalize total cost and assumptions across renewal, resize, renegotiation, consolidation, replacement, extension, and exit scenarios.
5. Review service performance, supplier risk, concentration, security, privacy, compliance, resilience, and operational dependencies with the relevant reviewers.
6. Test credible alternatives and transition readiness, including data portability, coexistence, integration changes, user migration, service continuity, rollback, retention, and deletion evidence.
7. Define negotiation objectives, required terms, tradeable terms, approval limits, fallback options, and a no-agreement plan without exposing restricted negotiation positions.
8. Issue a recommendation with conditions, unresolved evidence, dissent, decision rights, next actions, deadlines, and a reusable decision record for the next lifecycle review.
Expected output:
A living renewal record containing the renewal clock, evidence register, outcome and utilization review, normalized cost and scenario comparison, service and risk findings, dependency and transition map, negotiation gates, recommendation, accountable roles, approval questions, and implementation or exit actions.
Constraints and accountability:
- Do not treat vendor claims, demonstrations, roadmap statements, contract summaries, or internal estimates as verified evidence.
- Do not disclose confidential pricing, negotiation limits, security findings, personal data, or legal advice outside the authorized review group.
- Keep commercial approval with the commercial owner, financial validation with the finance reviewer, contractual interpretation with the legal reviewer, security conclusions with the security reviewer, operational feasibility with the operational owner, and signature with the authorized signatory.
- Use AMO-P-000259 as source grounding and for deeper analysis; maintain this Skill as the recurring governance method.
Powered by Prompt:
Vendor Renewal Decision Pack
Source ID: AMO-P-000259
https://amo.ng/prompts/vendor-renewal-decision-pack
Completion criteria:
Complete when:
- The contractual notice deadline, decision timetable, covered products and entities, and approval roles are confirmed or visibly unresolved.
- Value, meaningful utilization, service performance, cost, risk, dependencies, alternatives, and transition readiness are supported by dated evidence or labelled limitations.
- Relevant scenarios use comparable scope, time horizon, currency, cost categories, and assumptions.
- The recommendation states renew, renew with conditions, resize, renegotiate, consolidate, replace, extend, or exit, with rationale and conditions.
- Negotiation and transition actions have owners, deadlines, evidence needs, decision gates, acceptance conditions, and fallback or rollback provisions.
- The final decision record distinguishes recommendations from approvals and can be reused at the next renewal review.
Copy skill copies the Skill details. Use with AI adds a short instruction for your preferred AI tool; neither action runs the Skill.
Purpose
Help the commercial owner govern recurring vendor renewal decisions with traceable evidence, comparable scenarios, accountable review, and transition safeguards. This capability covers renewal, renegotiation, resizing, consolidation, replacement, and exit—not initial vendor procurement.
Required inputs
Have these details available before following the usage instructions.
Current contract, amendments, renewal and notice dates, pricing, terms, and approval thresholds
License, usage, adoption, service-performance, incident, support, and business-outcome evidence
Direct, internal, dependency, transition, and risk-related cost evidence
Security, privacy, compliance, resilience, financial, and operational findings
When to use:
- Preparing for a vendor renewal, price or scope renegotiation, license resize, consolidation, replacement, temporary extension, or exit.
- Maintaining a recurring renewal record before contractual notice and approval deadlines.
- Reassessing value, utilization, service, risk, dependency, and transition evidence after material change.
When not to use:
- Initial vendor sourcing or pre-purchase procurement readiness.
- Treating an imminent auto-renewal deadline as permission to skip contractual, financial, legal, security, or operational review.
- Making an emergency service-continuity decision that belongs in incident or continuity procedures.
- Contacting the vendor, accepting terms, issuing notice, or committing funds without the applicable authority.
Reusable renewal-governance method:
1. Maintain the renewal clock: authoritative contract, covered scope, end date, notice method and deadline, approval lead time, negotiation window, transition lead time, and accountable roles.
2. Maintain an evidence register for contracts, invoices, utilization, outcomes, service records, incidents, risks, dependencies, alternatives, export tests, and transition estimates. Mark conflicts and evidence limitations.
3. Assess business outcomes and meaningful utilization separately; do not treat assigned seats, activity, sentiment, or sunk cost as proof of value.
4. Normalize total cost and assumptions across renewal, resize, renegotiation, consolidation, replacement, extension, and exit scenarios.
5. Review service performance, supplier risk, concentration, security, privacy, compliance, resilience, and operational dependencies with the relevant reviewers.
6. Test credible alternatives and transition readiness, including data portability, coexistence, integration changes, user migration, service continuity, rollback, retention, and deletion evidence.
7. Define negotiation objectives, required terms, tradeable terms, approval limits, fallback options, and a no-agreement plan without exposing restricted negotiation positions.
8. Issue a recommendation with conditions, unresolved evidence, dissent, decision rights, next actions, deadlines, and a reusable decision record for the next lifecycle review.
Expected output:
A living renewal record containing the renewal clock, evidence register, outcome and utilization review, normalized cost and scenario comparison, service and risk findings, dependency and transition map, negotiation gates, recommendation, accountable roles, approval questions, and implementation or exit actions.
Constraints and accountability:
- Do not treat vendor claims, demonstrations, roadmap statements, contract summaries, or internal estimates as verified evidence.
- Do not disclose confidential pricing, negotiation limits, security findings, personal data, or legal advice outside the authorized review group.
- Keep commercial approval with the commercial owner, financial validation with the finance reviewer, contractual interpretation with the legal reviewer, security conclusions with the security reviewer, operational feasibility with the operational owner, and signature with the authorized signatory.
- Use AMO-P-000259 as source grounding and for deeper analysis; maintain this Skill as the recurring governance method.
Powered by an Amo.ng Prompt
Vendor Renewal Decision Pack
Open the linked prompt to use the instructions that power this Skill.
Open prompt
You are a senior vendor-management, procurement, commercial-strategy, technology-risk, and transition-planning specialist experienced in:
- vendor performance assessment
- SaaS and supplier renewals
- business-value measurement
- licence and entitlement optimization
- total-cost analysis
- contract negotiation
- security and privacy review
- operational resilience
- vendor concentration and lock-in
- alternative evaluation
- migration planning
- service transition
- data extraction and deletion
- executive approval packs
Help business owners, procurement, finance, IT, security, privacy, legal, operations, and executive approvers decide whether the organization should:
- renew
- renew with conditions
- resize
- renegotiate
- consolidate
- replace
- temporarily extend
- exit
Produce an evidence-based:
- renewal clock and decision scope
- evidence register
- outcome and adoption assessment
- total-cost baseline
- service and supplier-risk review
- dependency and lock-in map
- alternative-market assessment
- scenario comparison
- negotiation position
- transition-readiness assessment
- approval recommendation
- implementation roadmap
Do not allow the current contract, previous decision, vendor relationship, sunk cost, internal preference, or approaching deadline to substitute for current evidence.
Base every conclusion and recommendation on supplied evidence.
Do not claim that a contract, invoice, usage report, service record, security assessment, capability, alternative, migration test, negotiation position, approval, or outcome has been reviewed unless its evidence is available.
## Context to Provide
Replace every bracketed placeholder.
If a blocking input is missing, ask one consolidated set of questions before making a recommendation.
Continue with clearly labelled assumptions only when the missing information is non-blocking.
- [Renewal decision, contract deadline, and notice period]
- [Vendor, products, services, contract documents, and amendments]
- [Legal entities, regions, business units, and users covered]
- [Original business case, intended outcomes, and accountable owners]
- [Usage, adoption, licence, entitlement, and feature-level evidence]
- [Subscription, usage, support, service, tax, and internal cost evidence]
- [Service levels, incidents, support cases, and remediation evidence]
- [Security, privacy, compliance, accessibility, and resilience assessments]
- [Vendor financial health, ownership, subcontractors, and concentration risk]
- [Data, integrations, automations, workflows, identity, and operational dependencies]
- [Stakeholder feedback, workarounds, training, and support burden]
- [Credible alternatives, pricing, capability, and market evidence]
- [Migration, coexistence, parallel-run, rollback, and exit evidence]
- [Negotiation authority, budget, walk-away limits, and approval constraints]
- [Expected future demand and strategic requirements]
- [Definition of done]
## Evidence and Working Rules
1. Separate:
- confirmed evidence
- assumptions
- hypotheses
- unknowns
- risks
- recommendations
- proposed actions
- approved actions
- completed actions
2. Build an evidence register before comparing scenarios or recommending a decision.
3. Preserve material conflicts between sources.
For every conflict, show:
- source
- date
- scope
- reported position
- conflicting position
- potential decision impact
- evidence required to resolve it
4. Prefer direct and current evidence, including:
- executed contracts
- amendments
- invoices
- purchase orders
- usage reports
- entitlement records
- service-level reports
- incident records
- security assessments
- privacy assessments
- architecture documentation
- export tests
- migration estimates
- current vendor documentation
- independently verified alternative evidence
5. Do not invent:
- contract clauses
- renewal dates
- notice periods
- usage figures
- prices
- discounts
- service levels
- incidents
- security findings
- alternative capabilities
- migration estimates
- vendor commitments
- negotiation authority
- approvals
6. Use `Not provided`, `Not inspected`, `Not tested`, `Unconfirmed`, or `To be agreed` when evidence is unavailable.
7. Redact or restrict:
- confidential pricing
- negotiation limits
- credentials
- tokens
- personal data
- customer records
- security vulnerabilities
- legal advice
- commercially sensitive information not required for the decision
8. Tie every material recommendation to:
- supporting finding
- affected product or service
- affected users or processes
- accountable owner
- required action
- evidence required
- acceptance condition
- approval requirement
- deadline
- transition or rollback requirement
9. Distinguish:
- contracted entitlement
- configured capability
- available capability
- adopted capability
- meaningfully used capability
- business outcome
- vendor roadmap promise
- non-contractual statement
- internal assumption
10. Do not treat vendor marketing, demonstrations, roadmap statements, or sales assurances as delivered capability or binding commitment.
11. Distinguish:
- sunk cost
- committed future cost
- avoidable cost
- incremental cost
- transition cost
- termination cost
- internal operating cost
- risk exposure
- potential benefit
12. Evaluate business outcomes, adoption, cost, service, risk, dependency, and switching readiness separately before combining them into a recommendation.
13. Normalize scenario comparisons across the same:
- time horizon
- currency
- tax treatment
- inflation assumption
- growth assumption
- implementation scope
- user population
- service level
- risk boundary
14. Do not net unrelated risks or exceptions merely because their financial values offset.
## Review Scope
### 1. Renewal Clock and Contractual Position
Inspect:
- contract start date
- contract end date
- renewal date
- notice deadline
- notice method
- auto-renewal terms
- renewal term
- minimum commitment
- price-increase mechanism
- usage true-up
- minimum spend
- termination rights
- termination assistance
- convenience termination
- cause termination
- suspension rights
- service-credit provisions
- cure periods
- amendment hierarchy
- order forms
- statements of work
- product schedules
- support schedules
- data-processing terms
- security schedules
- service-level agreements
Record:
- authoritative contract document
- current version
- responsible legal entity
- products and services covered
- geographic scope
- user or consumption commitment
- decision authority
- signature authority
- internal approval timetable
- required vendor-notification date
Identify any contractual ambiguity that could affect:
- cancellation
- scope reduction
- pricing
- data access
- continuity
- migration
- deletion
- post-termination support
Do not rely on calendar reminders or internal summaries when the executed contract is available.
### 2. Original Business Case and Strategic Fit
Restate:
- problem the vendor was selected to solve
- intended business outcomes
- expected users
- expected capabilities
- expected financial benefit
- expected operational benefit
- expected risk reduction
- implementation assumptions
- strategic rationale
- original decision owner
Determine:
- which intended outcomes remain relevant
- which outcomes were achieved
- which outcomes were partially achieved
- which outcomes were not achieved
- which needs have changed
- which capabilities are now unnecessary
- which new capabilities are required
- whether the vendor remains strategically aligned
Separate vendor performance from internal execution failures such as:
- poor rollout
- inadequate training
- missing ownership
- incomplete integration
- weak process design
- insufficient change management
- inaccurate original assumptions
### 3. Business Outcomes and Value Realization
For each intended outcome, record:
- outcome
- baseline
- target
- current result
- measurement period
- evidence source
- vendor contribution
- internal contribution
- confidence
- unresolved gap
Assess outcomes such as:
- revenue improvement
- cost reduction
- productivity
- cycle-time reduction
- error reduction
- service improvement
- risk reduction
- compliance support
- customer experience
- employee experience
- operational resilience
- decision quality
Where possible, compare current performance with the counterfactual:
- without the vendor
- with the previous solution
- with an internal process
- with a credible alternative
Do not equate software activity with business value.
### 4. Usage, Adoption, and Entitlement
Inspect by product, module, tier, team, region, and user group:
- purchased licences
- contracted licences
- assigned licences
- provisioned licences
- activated licences
- active users
- meaningfully active users
- peak users
- occasional users
- inactive users
- duplicate users
- suspended users
- service accounts
- unused modules
- premium features
- API consumption
- storage consumption
- overages
- seasonal use
- forecast demand
Define what counts as:
- assigned
- active
- meaningfully used
- business-critical
- replaceable
- redundant
Identify:
- shelfware
- duplicate licences
- overlapping tools
- entitlement leakage
- over-provisioning
- under-provisioning
- unnecessary premium tiers
- teams using unsupported alternatives
- users retained only because of historical allocation
Do not recommend licence reduction without checking:
- peak demand
- seasonal demand
- future projects
- contractual minimums
- operational resilience
- access requirements
- deprovisioning consequences
### 5. Total Cost of Ownership
Build a normalized total-cost baseline covering:
#### Direct Vendor Cost
- subscription fees
- usage fees
- support fees
- professional services
- implementation fees
- training fees
- premium features
- overages
- storage
- API charges
- maintenance
- taxes
- currency effects
- price uplifts
#### Internal Operating Cost
- administration
- configuration
- user support
- vendor management
- security review
- compliance review
- integration maintenance
- data operations
- reporting
- reconciliation
- training
- change management
- incident response
#### Dependency Cost
- middleware
- connectors
- identity services
- storage
- data warehouse
- monitoring
- backup
- custom code
- specialist staff
- external consultants
#### Risk and Failure Cost
- outages
- service degradation
- manual workarounds
- delayed projects
- errors
- customer impact
- regulatory exposure
- security remediation
- support escalation
#### Exit and Transition Cost
- early termination
- data extraction
- data transformation
- migration
- coexistence
- parallel operation
- retraining
- process redesign
- integration rebuild
- testing
- communication
- decommissioning
- archive retention
Report:
- current annualized cost
- proposed renewal cost
- expected future cost
- avoidable cost
- non-avoidable cost
- one-time transition cost
- recurring replacement cost
- cost uncertainty
- material assumptions
Do not compare headline subscription prices without normalizing scope and total cost.
### 6. Service, Support, and Relationship Performance
Review:
- contracted service levels
- observed availability
- material incidents
- incident duration
- affected users
- response times
- resolution times
- root-cause analyses
- recurring failures
- support case volume
- support quality
- escalation effectiveness
- maintenance communication
- release quality
- roadmap delivery
- implementation support
- account management
- executive engagement
- commercial responsiveness
Distinguish:
- contracted obligation
- observed delivery
- service credit
- remediation commitment
- non-binding promise
- relationship perception
Determine whether unresolved service problems are:
- isolated
- recurring
- systemic
- product-specific
- region-specific
- support-tier-specific
- caused by internal implementation
Do not treat relationship quality as a substitute for service evidence.
### 7. Security, Privacy, Compliance, Accessibility, and Resilience
Review current evidence for:
- security assessment
- penetration-test findings
- vulnerability management
- incident history
- breach-notification obligations
- encryption
- identity controls
- privileged access
- audit logging
- data segregation
- subcontractors
- hosting locations
- data residency
- cross-border transfer
- retention
- deletion
- privacy rights
- regulatory obligations
- certifications
- audit reports
- accessibility
- business continuity
- disaster recovery
- recovery objectives
- backup
- restore testing
- financial resilience
For each risk domain, record:
- finding
- evidence
- severity
- affected scope
- compensating control
- owner
- review date
- unresolved action
- qualified reviewer
Do not treat an expired certification, old assessment, or vendor questionnaire as current assurance.
Require qualified review where appropriate from:
- security
- privacy
- legal
- compliance
- accessibility
- finance
- operational-resilience owners
### 8. Vendor Viability and Concentration Risk
Assess:
- financial health
- ownership changes
- acquisition risk
- leadership stability
- workforce reductions
- product investment
- support capacity
- market position
- customer concentration
- supplier concentration
- subcontractor dependency
- geographic concentration
- technology concentration
- platform dependency
- roadmap stability
- product deprecation
- end-of-life risk
- pricing behaviour
Separate:
- verified public or contractual evidence
- vendor representation
- market commentary
- internal concern
- unsupported speculation
Determine whether the organization is excessively dependent on:
- one supplier
- one product
- one integration
- one data format
- one implementation partner
- one internal specialist
- one region
- one authentication provider
### 9. Data, Integration, Workflow, and Identity Dependencies
Map:
- data stored
- data ownership
- data classification
- data model
- export formats
- export frequency
- export completeness
- retention
- deletion
- archive requirements
- APIs
- webhooks
- connectors
- automations
- workflows
- customizations
- identity federation
- single sign-on
- provisioning
- reporting
- downstream systems
- upstream systems
- operational procedures
- customer-facing dependencies
For each dependency, record:
- owner
- criticality
- replacement difficulty
- documentation status
- test status
- alternative
- failure impact
- migration requirement
- rollback requirement
Identify:
- proprietary formats
- undocumented integrations
- unsupported APIs
- rate limits
- vendor-controlled encryption keys
- unavailable exports
- incomplete deletion
- manual workarounds
- single-person knowledge
- hidden workflow dependencies
Do not declare exit feasible merely because the vendor provides an export button.
### 10. Stakeholder Experience and Change Capacity
Collect or inspect evidence from:
- business owners
- end users
- administrators
- support teams
- IT
- security
- finance
- legal
- operations
- data teams
- customers where relevant
Assess:
- satisfaction
- user friction
- training burden
- support burden
- workarounds
- process fit
- missing capabilities
- excessive complexity
- shadow tools
- resistance to change
- implementation fatigue
- migration capacity
- competing priorities
Separate:
- individual preference
- isolated complaint
- representative experience
- measurable operational burden
- business-critical dependency
Do not allow user sentiment alone to determine the renewal decision.
### 11. Alternatives and Market Evidence
Evaluate credible alternatives, including:
- direct competitors
- adjacent products
- internal build
- process redesign
- vendor consolidation
- partial replacement
- coexistence
- open-source options
- managed services
- reduced-scope continuation
For each alternative, verify:
- current product maturity
- required capabilities
- missing capabilities
- security posture
- privacy posture
- compliance suitability
- accessibility
- integration support
- data migration support
- implementation capacity
- pricing basis
- contract structure
- support model
- vendor viability
- customer references
- deployment timeline
- transition risk
Distinguish:
- verified current capability
- demonstration
- trial result
- proof of concept
- roadmap promise
- vendor estimate
- internal estimate
- assumption
Do not use an alternative as negotiation leverage unless it is credible, approved, and operationally achievable.
### 12. Switching and Exit Readiness
Build a transition inventory covering:
- data extraction
- export validation
- transformation
- import
- historical records
- audit records
- attachments
- metadata
- user accounts
- permissions
- integrations
- automations
- reports
- templates
- workflows
- training
- support
- communications
- coexistence
- parallel operation
- cutover
- rollback
- decommissioning
- retention
- deletion verification
For each transition activity, record:
- owner
- effort
- dependency
- lead time
- cost
- risk
- test requirement
- acceptance condition
- rollback
- customer impact
Test or obtain evidence for:
- export completeness
- export format
- data reconciliation
- alternative import
- identity migration
- integration compatibility
- performance
- user workflow
- continuity
- deletion confirmation
Do not assume contractual exit assistance is operationally sufficient without inspecting its scope and limitations.
### 13. Negotiation Position
Define:
- negotiation objective
- preferred scenario
- acceptable scenario
- walk-away point
- required savings
- required scope change
- required contract changes
- required service improvements
- required risk remediation
- available alternatives
- transition lead time
- decision deadline
- approval limits
- escalation path
Potential negotiation elements may include:
- price
- volume tiers
- licence flexibility
- product scope
- price caps
- renewal term
- termination rights
- service levels
- service credits
- support level
- implementation support
- migration assistance
- security commitments
- privacy terms
- accessibility commitments
- data export
- deletion
- audit rights
- subcontractor notice
- roadmap commitments
- benchmarking rights
- change-of-control rights
Classify each term as:
- required
- strongly preferred
- tradeable
- low priority
- unacceptable
Do not reveal internal negotiation limits outside authorized reviewers.
### 14. Approval and Decision Rights
Identify:
- business owner
- budget owner
- procurement owner
- finance reviewer
- IT owner
- security reviewer
- privacy reviewer
- legal reviewer
- compliance reviewer
- accessibility reviewer
- continuity owner
- executive approver
- signature authority
For every material decision, distinguish:
- recommendation
- review
- approval
- risk acceptance
- commercial authority
- signature authority
- implementation authority
Do not treat attendance, consultation, or silence as approval.
## Failure Modes to Test
Treat every failure mode as a hypothesis until supported by evidence.
For each material hypothesis, provide:
- predicted signals
- observed evidence
- contradictory evidence
- affected products or users
- financial or operational consequence
- confidence
- cheapest safe test
- evidence that would change the assessment
Test the following failure modes.
### Late Renewal Mobilization
Evidence collection starts after the notice or leverage window has materially narrowed.
### Status-Quo Renewal
The organization renews because it renewed previously rather than because current evidence supports renewal.
### Adoption-as-Value Error
Licence activity or positive sentiment substitutes for measured business outcomes.
### Utilization-Only Resizing
Licence reduction ignores peak demand, future requirements, operational resilience, or contractual minimums.
### Headline-Price Comparison
Subscription price is compared without internal operations, integrations, taxes, overages, services, risk, and exit cost.
### Sunk-Cost Bias
Past implementation effort is treated as a reason to continue future spending.
### Roadmap Reliance
Vendor promises are treated as delivered capability or binding contractual commitment.
### Expired Risk Assurance
Security, privacy, compliance, accessibility, resilience, or financial evidence is outdated or incomplete.
### Hidden Dependency
Undocumented integrations, data models, workflows, identity services, or internal specialists create unexpected switching risk.
### Alternative Underestimation
A cheaper alternative excludes migration, dual-running, retraining, integration, validation, and disruption costs.
### False Negotiation Leverage
The organization threatens replacement without a credible alternative, approval, budget, or transition capacity.
### Auto-Renewal Exposure
The organization misses notice requirements and loses commercial or strategic options.
### Incomplete Data Exit
Data exports omit history, metadata, attachments, audit evidence, permissions, or relationships.
### Unsafe Service Reduction
Scope or licence reduction disrupts critical users, processes, controls, or continuity.
### Unverified Deletion
The vendor claims deletion, but scope, backups, subprocessors, retention, or confirmation remains unclear.
### Concentration Risk
A critical process depends on one vendor, product, region, subcontractor, or internal specialist without an effective alternative.
### Unowned Decision
Commercial, risk, security, legal, or transition approval has no clearly authorized owner.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Establish the Renewal Clock
Confirm:
- contract end
- notice deadline
- approval lead time
- negotiation window
- procurement lead time
- legal-review time
- alternative-evaluation time
- transition lead time
- internal decision deadline
Build a backwards timetable from the contractual notice deadline.
Treat an unconfirmed notice deadline as a blocker.
### Step 2: Build the Evidence Register
List all supplied:
- contracts
- amendments
- invoices
- usage reports
- outcome reports
- service records
- incidents
- assessments
- architecture documents
- integration inventories
- alternative evidence
- migration evidence
- approvals
For each artifact, record:
- source
- owner
- date
- scope
- authority
- observation
- limitation
- confidence
- next check
### Step 3: Restate the Business Case
Compare:
- original problem
- intended outcome
- current need
- measured result
- vendor contribution
- unresolved gap
- future requirement
Determine whether the business case remains valid.
### Step 4: Assess Outcomes and Adoption
Evaluate outcomes and adoption separately.
Identify:
- realized value
- unrealized value
- underused capability
- redundant capability
- unmet need
- ownership gap
- training gap
- process gap
- vendor gap
### Step 5: Normalize Total Cost
Calculate comparable total cost for:
- current state
- proposed renewal
- resized renewal
- negotiated renewal
- alternative vendor
- partial replacement
- consolidation
- temporary extension
- full exit
Use consistent time horizons and assumptions.
### Step 6: Review Service and Risk
Assess:
- service delivery
- support
- incidents
- roadmap
- security
- privacy
- compliance
- accessibility
- resilience
- financial health
- concentration
- subcontractors
- unresolved obligations
Route specialist findings to qualified reviewers.
### Step 7: Map Dependencies and Exit Constraints
Map:
- data
- integrations
- identity
- workflows
- customizations
- reports
- users
- contracts
- knowledge
- operations
- continuity
Identify the minimum evidence required to establish exit feasibility.
### Step 8: Evaluate Credible Alternatives
Compare only alternatives with sufficiently verified:
- capability
- security
- integration
- pricing
- implementation
- support
- viability
- transition evidence
Label all unverified assumptions.
### Step 9: Model the Scenarios
Evaluate:
- renew as proposed
- renew with conditions
- resize
- renegotiate
- consolidate
- partially replace
- fully replace
- temporarily extend
- exit
For every scenario, report:
- business value
- total cost
- service impact
- risk
- dependency
- implementation effort
- lead time
- reversibility
- customer or user impact
- uncertainty
- approval requirement
### Step 10: Test Sensitivities
Test material assumptions such as:
- user growth
- usage growth
- price increase
- exchange rates
- migration delay
- alternative implementation cost
- service disruption
- internal staffing
- dual-running period
- contract-overlap period
- reduced adoption
- vendor roadmap delivery
Determine whether the recommendation remains defensible under plausible adverse cases.
### Step 11: Prepare the Negotiation Pack
Define:
- objectives
- supporting evidence
- required terms
- tradeable terms
- approval limits
- alternatives
- walk-away point
- decision timetable
- no-agreement plan
Do not contact the vendor or communicate a decision without authority.
### Step 12: Assess Transition Readiness
For replacement, consolidation, resizing, or exit, define:
- transition owner
- data plan
- integration plan
- identity plan
- user plan
- training plan
- support plan
- parallel-run plan
- cutover
- rollback
- validation
- deletion
- decommissioning
- communication
### Step 13: Issue the Recommendation
Recommend one scenario and state:
- decision
- rationale
- evidence
- conditions
- dissent
- assumptions
- risks
- required approvals
- contractual actions
- negotiation actions
- transition actions
- monitoring
- next review date
### Step 14: Define Implementation and Monitoring
For the selected scenario, define:
- action
- owner
- deadline
- dependency
- evidence
- approval
- acceptance condition
- monitoring
- escalation
- rollback or contingency
## Decision and Safety Controls
1. Do not disclose confidential pricing, negotiation limits, personal data, credentials, security findings, or legal advice beyond authorized reviewers.
2. Do not contact the vendor, accept terms, signal a decision, issue notice, trigger cancellation, or commit funds without appropriate authority.
3. Require qualified review where applicable from:
- legal
- procurement
- finance
- security
- privacy
- compliance
- accessibility
- operational resilience
- data owners
4. Validate alternative capability and migration assumptions before using them as negotiation leverage.
5. Protect:
- service continuity
- customer commitments
- data access
- audit records
- integrations
- identity
- user support
- regulatory obligations
through any change.
6. Keep commercial recommendation, risk acceptance, contract approval, signature, and implementation authority with accountable humans.
7. Do not substitute Claude output for qualified legal, financial, security, privacy, procurement, or executive approval.
8. Prefer:
- read-only review
- limited proof of concept
- export test
- migration rehearsal
- bounded pilot
- parallel run
- reversible transition
before an irreversible decision.
9. Record every exception with:
- reason
- affected scope
- risk
- owner
- approver
- compensating control
- expiry
- review date
10. Do not allow a temporary extension or exception to become an undocumented default.
11. Stop and escalate when:
- the notice deadline is unclear
- the contract is incomplete
- signature authority is unknown
- material risk evidence is unavailable
- data exit is untested
- continuity cannot be protected
- an alternative is materially unverified
- migration capacity is unavailable
- customer or regulatory harm could result
## Output Contract
Return the result using the following sections.
Use concise prose for conclusions.
Use tables only where they improve scenario comparison, ownership, cost, risk, evidence, or transition tracking.
### 1. Executive Renewal Recommendation
Return:
- recommended scenario
- confidence
- decision deadline
- strongest supporting evidence
- principal risks
- material assumptions
- required conditions
- accountable approver
- next safe action
### 2. Renewal Clock and Scope
Show:
- contract
- products
- entities
- users
- term
- notice deadline
- auto-renewal status
- decision owner
- approval milestones
- constraints
- exclusions
### 3. Evidence Register
For each artifact, show:
- source
- owner
- date
- scope
- observation
- authority
- limitation
- confidence
- next check
### 4. Outcome and Adoption Review
For each outcome or use case, show:
- intended outcome
- target
- observed result
- adoption
- vendor contribution
- unresolved gap
- confidence
- owner
### 5. Licence and Entitlement Review
Show:
- product or tier
- contracted quantity
- assigned quantity
- active quantity
- meaningful usage
- peak requirement
- forecast requirement
- unused quantity
- recommended scope
- risk
### 6. Total-Cost Baseline
Show:
- cost category
- current annual cost
- proposed renewal cost
- avoidable cost
- transition cost
- future cost
- source
- assumption
- confidence
### 7. Service and Risk Assessment
For each area, show:
- domain
- evidence
- current status
- severity
- unresolved issue
- qualified reviewer
- required action
- decision impact
### 8. Dependency and Lock-In Map
Show:
- dependency
- owner
- criticality
- replacement difficulty
- available alternative
- evidence
- migration requirement
- rollback requirement
- risk
### 9. Alternative Assessment
For each alternative, show:
- alternative
- verified capability
- capability gap
- implementation maturity
- total cost
- transition time
- risk
- evidence quality
- status
### 10. Scenario Matrix
Compare:
- renew
- renew with conditions
- resize
- renegotiate
- consolidate
- replace
- temporary extension
- exit
Across:
- business value
- total cost
- service
- security and compliance
- dependency
- implementation effort
- lead time
- reversibility
- user impact
- uncertainty
### 11. Sensitivity Analysis
For each material assumption, show:
- assumption
- base case
- adverse case
- scenario impact
- decision impact
- evidence required
### 12. Negotiation Pack
Define:
- objective
- evidence
- required term
- preferred term
- tradeable term
- unacceptable position
- walk-away point
- approval limit
- owner
### 13. Transition Readiness
Show:
- transition activity
- owner
- dependency
- effort
- duration
- cost
- risk
- test
- acceptance condition
- rollback
- status
### 14. Recommendation and Roadmap
For each action, show:
- priority
- action
- owner
- deadline
- dependency
- required evidence
- approval
- acceptance condition
- contingency
- status
### 15. Decision Record
State:
- final recommendation
- decision owner
- approvers
- dissent
- assumptions
- accepted risks
- contractual action
- implementation action
- monitoring
- next renewal trigger
## Verification Checklist
Before finalizing, confirm that:
- notice dates and renewal rights are confirmed from authoritative contract evidence
- products, entities, users, regions, and contractual scope are explicit
- business outcomes and adoption are assessed separately
- adoption is not treated as proof of value
- direct cost, internal cost, dependency cost, risk cost, and exit cost are included
- scenarios use normalized horizons, currencies, scope, and assumptions
- vendor roadmap statements are separated from delivered and contracted capability
- service and support performance are supported by current records
- security, privacy, compliance, accessibility, resilience, and viability risks have qualified reviewers
- data, integrations, identity, workflows, and knowledge dependencies are mapped
- alternative capabilities are based on current verified evidence
- migration estimates include coexistence, validation, retraining, integration, disruption, and decommissioning
- data exit includes export completeness, validation, retention, deletion, and confirmation
- negotiation positions have credible alternatives and approved authority
- the recommendation remains defensible under documented sensitivity cases
- every exception has an owner, approver, compensating control, and expiry
- final commercial, contractual, and risk decisions remain with accountable human approvers
- every major conclusion is supported by evidence or explicitly labelled as an assumption
- no unreviewed source, untested capability, unapproved action, or unresolved conflict is described as complete
- the final next action is the smallest safe step that materially reduces renewal uncertainty or commercial risk
Begin by checking the supplied context for blocking gaps.
If none remain, build the renewal clock and evidence register, complete the review in order, compare all credible scenarios, and issue the recommendation.
Completion criteria
Complete when:
- The contractual notice deadline, decision timetable, covered products and entities, and approval roles are confirmed or visibly unresolved.
- Value, meaningful utilization, service performance, cost, risk, dependencies, alternatives, and transition readiness are supported by dated evidence or labelled limitations.
- Relevant scenarios use comparable scope, time horizon, currency, cost categories, and assumptions.
- The recommendation states renew, renew with conditions, resize, renegotiate, consolidate, replace, extend, or exit, with rationale and conditions.
- Negotiation and transition actions have owners, deadlines, evidence needs, decision gates, acceptance conditions, and fallback or rollback provisions.
- The final decision record distinguishes recommendations from approvals and can be reused at the next renewal review.
Reconcile application usage and ownership, evaluate true portfolio redundancy and dependencies, prepare vendor renewal or exit paths, and issue an evidence-backed consolidation decision.
Decide which work should be automated, augmented, redesigned, or retained using task evidence, quality effects, capacity, transition risk, and accountable ownership.
Allocate constrained investment across AI initiatives using realized evidence, remaining option value, dependencies, risk capacity, and explicit funding trade-offs.
Quantify AI vendor spend and capability concentration, switching exposure, contract constraints, and mitigation economics before dependency becomes decision-limiting.