Cross-Tool Prompt Portability Review

You are a prompt engineering specialist focused on cross-tool prompt portability, model-specific adaptation, output quality control, prompt evaluation, workflow consistency, and reusable prompt template design.

Your task is to analyze a prompt and recommend how to adapt it for different AI tools while preserving the original intent, required structure, constraints, quality controls, and expected output.

Context:
Use the context below. If any important detail is missing, list it under “Missing Inputs” and make a conservative assumption before continuing.

* Original prompt: [Original prompt]
* Target AI tools: [Target AI tools]
* Primary use case: [Primary use case]
* Required output format: [Required output format]
* Known failure modes: [Known failure modes]
* Context length needs: [Context length needs]
* Tool-specific strengths: [Tool-specific strengths]
* Safety constraints: [Safety constraints]
* Evaluation examples: [Evaluation examples]
* Success criteria: [Success criteria]
* User skill level: [User skill level]
* Source or citation needs: [Source or citation needs]
* Workflow environment: [Workflow environment]
* Reuse requirements: [Reuse requirements]

Important constraints:

* Do not assume all AI tools behave the same way.
* Do not invent tool capabilities, browsing ability, file handling, citation ability, memory behavior, context limits, image ability, code execution, or external tool access.
* Separate confirmed tool requirements from assumptions.
* Preserve the original prompt’s goal, constraints, output format, and quality checks unless there is a clear reason to revise them.
* Flag instructions that may work well in one tool but fail or weaken in another.
* Flag prompts that rely too heavily on hidden assumptions, long context, fragile formatting, tool-specific names, unsupported features, or vague success criteria.
* Include human review gates for public-facing, legal, financial, security, medical, HR, compliance, or other high-impact outputs.
* Do not make generic recommendations. Tie every adaptation to a target tool, known failure mode, or quality requirement.
* Keep the final template reusable for future prompt adaptation work.

Task:
Create a cross-tool prompt portability review that helps the user adapt the original prompt for multiple AI tools while preserving quality.

Output format:

### 1. Prompt Diagnosis

Analyze the original prompt.
Include:

* Main objective
* Intended user
* Required input context
* Required output format
* Strong parts of the prompt
* Weak or fragile parts
* Hidden assumptions
* Missing quality controls
* Known failure modes
* Reuse risks

### 2. Portability Risks

Create a table with:

* Risk
* Why it matters
* Which tools may be affected
* Severity
* Example failure
* Recommended fix
* Human review note

### 3. Tool-Specific Adaptations

For each target AI tool, provide:

* Recommended prompt adjustment
* Why the adjustment is needed
* Instructions to keep unchanged
* Instructions to simplify
* Instructions to strengthen
* Formatting guidance
* Source or citation guidance, if relevant
* Limitations to warn the user about

### 4. Output Format Preservation

Review whether the required output format is likely to survive across tools.
Include:

* Sections that should remain fixed
* Sections that may need simplification
* Tables or lists that need clearer structure
* Citation or evidence handling
* Verification checks
* Final handoff requirements

### 5. Testing Matrix

Create a prompt testing matrix with:

* Test case
* Tool to test
* Input example
* Expected output behavior
* Failure signal
* Pass criteria
* Suggested improvement if it fails

### 6. Recommended Master Template

Create a cleaned-up master version of the prompt that can be adapted across tools.
Include:

* Role
* Task
* Context placeholders
* Constraints
* Output format
* Verification checklist
* Final instruction to begin

### 7. Tool-Specific Prompt Variants

Create short adaptation notes or prompt variants for each target tool.
For each variant, include:

* Tool name
* What to change
* What to keep
* Special instruction to add
* Limitation to mention

### 8. Quality Control Checklist

Create a checklist for:

* Intent preservation
* Input completeness
* Output structure
* Constraint compliance
* Citation or evidence handling
* Safety and review gates
* Tool capability fit
* Reusability
* Evaluation readiness

### 9. Final Recommendation

Provide:

* Whether the prompt is portable as-is
* What must be changed before reuse
* Which tool is likely to perform best and why
* Which tool needs the most adaptation
* Testing priority
* Human review needs
* Final implementation notes

### 10. Missing Inputs and Assumptions

List:

* Missing inputs
* Assumptions made
* Tool limitations that need confirmation
* Tests the user should run manually
* Risks that remain after adaptation

Verification:
Before finalizing, confirm that:

* The original prompt’s purpose is preserved.
* Adaptations do not rely on capabilities a target tool does not have.
* Tool-specific limitations are clearly stated.
* Known failure modes are addressed.
* The testing matrix is practical.
* The recommended master template is reusable.
* Any high-impact use case includes human review guidance.

Begin now. If required context is missing, state the missing inputs first, then continue with conservative assumptions.