Trace Consequential Claims to Original Evidence
Apply a repeatable claim-provenance method that traces consequential wording through citations and intermediaries to original evidence, exposing mutation, laundering, and authority gaps.
Reusable AI capabilities
Use focused capabilities powered by published Amo.ng prompts and workflows. Skills package what to provide, how to use the source asset, and what completion looks like—without pretending to run autonomously.
Apply a repeatable claim-provenance method that traces consequential wording through citations and intermediaries to original evidence, exposing mutation, laundering, and authority gaps.
Trace expected AI value through task selection, adoption, workflow integration, quality, review, rework, exceptions, downstream capacity, and benefit capture to find supported leakage mechanisms.
Apply a repeatable unit-economics method that allocates AI operating costs to quality-adjusted accepted outcomes rather than raw calls, tokens, tasks, or generated outputs.
Maintain a reusable evidence ledger for AI-generated dependency, API, framework, configuration, command, and version claims throughout software review and release.
Apply a repeatable admissibility method to decide whether AI evaluation evidence is reliable enough for a stated release, monitoring, or operating decision.
Trace sensitive context across retrieval, agent handoffs, memory, tools, logs, caches, and shared workspaces to identify unauthorized propagation and required control changes.
Apply a repeatable principal-chain method to determine which identity acted, what authority was delegated, where context changed, and which actions require repair or review.
Audit documents, slides, video, audio, images, assessments, and LMS delivery for accessibility barriers, then prioritize learning-equivalent remediation and verification.
Maintain a living governance state for an API transition, tracking contracts, clients, compatibility, migration evidence, communications, exceptions, repeated lifecycle gates, sunset criteria, and recovery readiness.
Evaluate a retrieval-augmented generation system by separating corpus, retrieval, context assembly, answer generation, citation, and abstention failures, then define reproducible regression criteria.
Apply a reusable evidence-to-experiment method that converts website observations, behavior data, and user evidence into a falsifiable UX hypothesis with instrumentation, guardrails, and decision thresholds.
Apply a repeatable readiness gate to a proposed AI-supported workflow, test its evidence, controls, ownership, and failure readiness, and issue a bounded proceed, pilot, redesign, or defer decision.