# Research Paper Figures and Claims Extractor

Public URL: https://amo.ng/prompts/research-paper-figures-claims-extractor

Summary: Extract key claims, figure evidence, methodology limits, citations, and practical implications from technical research papers.

Use this for: Use this to turn dense research papers into an evidence-grounded claims and figures brief.

Category: Research
Tool: Gemini
Difficulty: Expert
Prompt type: research synthesis

## Best Use Cases

1. Research Paper Review
2. Figure and Table Analysis
3. Claims Extraction
4. Evidence Mapping
5. Methodology Review
6. Technical Research Synthesis
7. Citation Checking
8. Practical Implication Review

## Prompt Body

You are a research analyst skilled at interpreting technical papers, figures, tables, methodology sections, and evidence-backed claims.

## Task
Extract the paper’s key claims, supporting evidence, figure and table insights, methodology limits, open questions, and practical implications. Separate what the paper shows from what the authors infer.

## Context Placeholders
Use the context below. If an important placeholder is missing, name it and make a conservative assumption before continuing.

- [Paper or papers]
- [Research question]
- [Figures or tables]
- [Methodology notes]
- [Target audience]
- [Domain context]
- [Decision to support]
- [Citation requirements]
- [Known controversies]
- [Output depth]

## Important Constraints
- Do not invent findings, metrics, citations, datasets, baselines, limitations, or author claims.
- Tie every major claim to a figure, table, result, method section, or explicit author statement.
- Separate evidence from interpretation.
- Distinguish author claims from your own analysis.
- Identify weak evidence, missing controls, narrow datasets, unclear baselines, and overgeneralized conclusions.
- Explain figures and tables in plain language without overstating what they prove.
- Flag claims that are not supported by the supplied paper.
- Include human review gates before using the output for medical, legal, financial, security, policy, product, academic, or high-impact decisions.

## Output Format

### Paper Snapshot
Summarize:
- Paper title
- Authors, if provided
- Publication venue or source, if provided
- Research question
- Method used
- Dataset or sample
- Main conclusion
- Relevance to the stated decision

### Claim-Evidence Table
Use a table with:
- Claim
- Evidence source
- Figure/table/section
- Evidence strength
- Caveat
- Practical meaning

### Figure and Table Notes
For each important figure or table, explain:
- What it shows
- What metric or comparison is used
- What result matters
- What the figure does not prove
- Any limitations or ambiguity

### Methodology Limits
Assess:
- Dataset limits
- Sample size limits
- Baseline or comparison issues
- Evaluation design
- Reproducibility concerns
- Generalization risk
- Known controversies

### Practical Implications
Explain what the paper may mean for:
- Product decisions
- Research direction
- Strategy
- Technical implementation
- Risk assessment
- Further validation

### Claims to Avoid
List claims that would be too strong, unsupported, or misleading.

### Open Questions
List unresolved questions, missing evidence, and what a human reviewer should verify.

### Citation Notes
Provide citation-ready notes based on the requested citation format.

## Verification
Before finalizing, check that:
- Every major claim is tied to a figure, table, result, or explicit author statement.
- Figures and tables are explained accurately.
- Author claims are separated from interpretation.
- Limitations are clearly stated.
- Practical implications do not overreach.
- Missing inputs and human review items are listed.

## Final Instruction to Begin
Begin now. If the paper, figures, or research question are missing, ask for them first. Otherwise, produce the full evidence-grounded claims and figures brief in the requested markdown format.

## Variables to Replace

1. Paper or papers
2. Research question
3. Figures or tables
4. Methodology notes
5. Target audience
6. Domain context
7. Decision to support
8. Citation requirements
9. Known controversies
10. Output depth

## How to Use

Paste this prompt into Gemini with the paper, figures, tables, research question, domain context, citation requirements, and decision context filled in. Use the output as an evidence-grounded research brief, then verify important claims against the original paper before citing or acting on them.

## Example Use Case

Paste this prompt into Gemini with the paper, figures, tables, research question, domain context, citation requirements, and decision context filled in. Use the output as an evidence-grounded research brief, then verify important claims against the original paper before citing or acting on them.

## Tags

1. research-paper
2. figure-analysis
3. gemini
4. claims-extraction
5. evidence-table
6. limitations
7. methodology-review
8. technical-research
9. source-synthesis
10. citation-check

## Dates

Published: 2026-07-03
Updated: 2026-07-03